Clean Water Hypocrisy

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Clean Water Hypocrisy

December 29, 2021 - 17:42
Posted in:

The La Crosse County Board Executive Committee has approved a non-binding referendum for the April 5th ballot. The referendum will ask if the state of Wisconsin should establish a right to clean water.

Hundreds of wells in the Town of Campbell are contaminated with cancer causing PFAS from the use of firefighting foam at the City of La Crosse owned airport. Residents are being provided bottled water at a cost of about $500,000 per year by the State of Wisconsin.

La Crosse County’s response was to appropriate $10,000 to study the PFAS problem in the Town of Campbell. County Board Chairwoman Monica Kruse was quoted saying,

”The county probably doesn’t have the money to provide clean water for everyone.”

Seriously? The City of La Crosse and La Crosse County are receiving $45 million in federal aid through the American Rescue Plan Act. Still more federal money will flow from the $1.2 trillion dollar infrastructure bill recently passed by Congress.

The hypocrisy is breathtaking.

County Supervisor Kevin Hoyer has suggested in the County’s Planning, Resources and Development Committee that the county spend some of the windfall of ARPA dollars on expanding the City of La Crosse sewer and water system into Campbell. Evidently such common sense is not a prevailing view in our county government.

Interestingly, according to Kruse the county is willing to spend $5,000 to place this pointless referendum on the April ballot. She also says she expects the referendum to pass. No kidding? People want clean water - what a surprise. Let’s save the $10,000 for a study. We don’t need more studies and referenda we need action.

Can ARPA dollars be spent to expand La Crosse sewer and water into Campbell? Here is exactly what the US Treasury Department website says about how ARPA can be spent.

Invest in water, sewer, and broadband infrastructure, making necessary investments to improve access to clean drinking water, support vital wastewater and stormwater infrastructure, and to expand access to broadband internet

Currently, plans by the city and county are to spend this windfall of dollars from the federal government on onetime feelgood projects that provide no lasting benefit to our community. Why not spend some of the money on infrastructure that will last for decades?

All twenty-nine County Supervisors are up for reelection on the April 5th ballot. Take the time to find out which candidates are serious about solving problems in our community and vote accordingly.

Bill Feehan

There are 2 Comments

La Crosse County does not have intelligent, responsible, common sense representation, and that should change. Yes we have some, but the majority are people who are stupid or agenda driven. That agenda does not serve sustainable government, and the voters can have a huge input, by electing more people who have a clue.

Last comment our elected people need to spend this money carefully, our children will pay for this forever!

To me the answer is obvious. The airport caused the problem, the airport and its owners (presumably the county and city) should make whole those whom they have harmed. Federal aid or no, both individual and corporate responsibility should not be absolved.

'The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is to fill the world with fools. 'Herbert Spencer.

Often dangerous and malevolent ones. (fools)

Add new comment

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.